0:15Product launch video dropping into edit mode
Product launch video dropping into edit mode — Vídeo de @ArchiveExplorer com Opus 5.5. Assista ao vídeo e leia a publicação original para entender o contexto.
0:16 · 298 curtidas no registro de origem · 41K visualizações no registro de origem
Publicação do criador
Publicações e títulos originais são preservados no idioma de origem.
jev + opus 5.5 for design is insane...
a launch video used to mean an agency, weeks of back and forth and a fat invoice.
now Opus 5.5 makes the video, the ad cuts and the landing page from one brief.
the video below: made in 3 minutes. at 0:09 it drops into edit mode - dot grid, selection handles, pixel sizes on every card - so you see exactly how it was built.
but most people get the same mid result: centered text, gradient background, everything fading in. That's Opus's default look when it has nothing to copy.
here's the pipeline that makes it look like an agency did it:
1. Build the brand brain first
→ logo, colors, fonts, screenshots of your real product, your best ad copy
→ have Opus turn it into a DESIGN.md. The video and the site both follow it
2. Steal a reference, don't describe one
→ pick 1-2 launch videos with the pacing you want
→ "make it like this" beats "make it modern and punchy" every time
3. Give it a renderer
→ install HyperFrames or Remotion: every scene is code, rendered straight to mp4
→ a change = one line and a re-render, not starting over
4. Use real components
→ buttons, cards and UI from 21st_dev instead of empty placeholder boxes
→ fake-looking UI is the fastest way to look cheap
5. Storyboard before motion
→ 3 storyboard options, you pick one, then one still per scene
→ fixing a still takes seconds, fixing a render takes a re-render
6. Run it as a 4-person team + jev
→ breakdown: pull pacing, type and transitions from the reference
→ storyboard: the 3 options and the stills
→ build: every scene in code, music, draft render
→ review: watch it second by second, list the problems, touch nothing
→ jev: scores every review note against DESIGN.md (fix now / later / skip) in milliseconds, so build only touches what matters
7. Cut the ads from the same project
→ same scenes, different hooks: pain first, result first, offer first
→ 9:16 for reels, 1:1 for feed, 16:9 for YouTube. No reshoots
8. Ship the landing page from the same DESIGN.md
→ the hero is a looping cut of the launch video
→ before launch: mobile, every button state, zero placeholder text
9. Give notes like a director
→ "slow this zoom by half", "hard cut here", "push in on the button"
→ "make it better" gets random changes
paste this into Claude Code 👇
"Read my brand folder and write DESIGN.md. Break down the reference video I give you: pacing, type, transitions. Show me 3 storyboards, then one still per scene for the one I pick. Build every scene in HyperFrames, add music, render a draft. Review it second by second without editing and list the problems. Pass every note to Jev and have it score each one against DESIGN.md: fix now / later / skip. Fix only "fix now". After I approve: cut 3 ad variants with different hooks in 9:16, 1:1 and 16:9, then build the landing page from the same DESIGN.md with the video loop as the hero."
everyone has the same model. bookmark this and start using the edge.
Este é o texto do criador, não um prompt de geração verificado.




