0:15Building a volcano scene comparison
Building a volcano scene comparison — Vidéo de @WescheNex1q avec DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. Regardez la vidéo et lisez la publication originale pour comprendre son contexte.
0:16 · 20 mentions J’aime dans les données sources · 1.2K vues dans les données sources
Publication du créateur
Les publications et les titres originaux sont conservés dans leur langue d’origine.
Old DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs the new V4.1 Flash 1017, head to head on 2 DGX Sparks. Same prompt, same settings, thinking on.
Each model built a volcano, then got up to 3 rounds to review its own page. Each round it saw real screenshots plus a written description of what was on screen. The reviewer only stated facts and never suggested fixes. The model alone decided: KEEP, or edit the file. No human intervention.
-Original: first try 66.6K tokens / 29 min. It said KEEP in round 1: it reasoned the eruption is timed to start at 29s, so the early screenshots just hadn't reached it yet. It was right.
Total: 85.8K tokens / 39 min
-1017: first try 56.1K / 25 min, then fixed it 3 times (53.7K, 29.2K, 36.0K). It never said KEEP; each version erupted sooner and bigger. Round 3 was its last chance.
Total: 175K tokens / 75 min
1017 is cheaper per answer and much stronger on long builds, but its judgment is less steady. Edited the volcano 3 times even though it was already working
Il s’agit du texte du créateur, pas d’un prompt de génération vérifié.




