MotionVideo.me2008
中

Seedance运镜控制对比测试

Seedance运镜控制对比测试,由 @NEXUS_TO_NOVA 使用 Seedance 2.0 创作。观看视频,阅读创作者原帖,了解作品背景。

0:15 · 220 赞(来源快照) · 8K 次浏览(来源快照)

创作者帖子

创作者帖子和原始作品标题保留来源语言。

While testing Seedance 2.5, I discovered something useful for AI filmmakers that could save you a lot of credits. Whenever I tried to generate a 30-second sequence with heavy VFX and unconventional camera choreography, the model often drifted away from the camera movements I described. So I tried something different. I isolated the VFX moment and generated it as a standalone 6-second shot. The difference was huge. Both Seedance 2.5 and 2.0 followed my camera choreography much more closely, including the exact movement path and how far I wanted the camera to travel. What surprised me even more was how well Seedance 2.0 performed. In some cases, it actually handled my instructions better than 2.5, which I wasn't expecting. If you're creating an impactful VFX shot that requires precise, non-standard camera movements, try generating that moment separately and assembling it in the edit. You could save yourself a lot of failed generations and wasted credits. This video was generated with Seedance 2.0

这是创作者的帖子文字,不是经过核验的生成提示词。

查看原帖 ↗

搜索标题、创作者帖子和风格,按回车查看结果。